Can Our Lithium Bring Back the Night Train? Zimbabwe’s Mineral-for-Railways Deal With China — Explained, and Questioned | The Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 37 | TeteGetty.com
TeteGetty.com
The Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 37
27 June 2026
The Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 37 · Minerals & Infrastructure
The Night Train · White Gold · and a Deal With China We Must Read Carefully

Can Our Lithium Bring Back the Night Train? Zimbabwe’s Mineral-for-Railways Deal With China — Explained, and Questioned

On 24 June, in the Chinese city of Dalian, our Finance Minister said something that made this old train-lover’s heart leap: Zimbabwe is in talks to rebuild its roads and railways using the wealth of our lithium. For anyone who ever rode the night train from Bulawayo to Harare, or Mutare to Harare, that is a beautiful dream. But a dream with a price tag this large deserves to be understood by every Zimbabwean — not only the bankers in the room. So let us walk through it together: what was announced, how it would work, why our railway fell so far, and the one hard question we must all ask before we sign.

The Deal, Explained Why the Railway Fell Lithium = Our Bargaining Chip The DRC Warning Bring Back the Train
US$34bn
Needed to Fix Our Roads & Rail
14.4m → <3m
Rail Freight Collapse (Tonnes/Yr)
1.13m t
Lithium Sent to China in 2025
Jan 2027
Raw-Concentrate Export Ban Holds
There is a particular magic to falling asleep in Bulawayo and waking in Harare, the rails singing beneath you all night long. We let that magic rust in the long grass. Now they say our lithium might buy it back. The question is not whether we want the train. It is what we are willing to pay for it — and to whom.
Entry 37 · written for everyone who ever heard that whistle in the dark.
A Personal Word

First, Let Me Tell You About the Night Train

Forgive me a moment of feeling before the figures, because this story is not only economics to me. I grew up on that night train. Bulawayo to Harare, Mutare to Harare — mumbombera, as some of us called her — the brown coaches, the smell of the seats, the vendors at every platform pressing maputi and cool drinks through the windows, the whole country sliding past in the dark while the wheels kept their steady song. You boarded at dusk in one city and the dawn handed you to another. For a child, it was the closest thing to magic the real world offered. So when our Finance Minister stood up in China this week and spoke of rebuilding our railways, I will confess: I felt butterflies.

But love is exactly why we must be careful. You do not hand over the family’s most precious inheritance to the first person who promises to fix the house — not without reading every line of the contract. And the inheritance on the table here is the largest one we have: the mineral wealth beneath our feet. So let us love the train enough to think clearly about the deal.

What Was Announced

The Deal, in Plain Words

On 24 June 2026, on the sidelines of a World Economic Forum gathering in Dalian, China, Finance Minister Professor Mthuli Ncube announced that Zimbabwe had begun talks with China Railway about a way of paying for new roads and railways called “resource-backed financing.” In his own words: “We spoke to them about resource-linked debt instruments that we want to explore going forward to support our infrastructure development, especially roads and rail.” It is not a signed deal — it is an early conversation. But the idea is important enough to understand fully.

Plain Language · Tichakurukura Pachikuru
“Resource-backed financing” sounds complicated. It is actually simple, and you already know it. It is borrowing against something valuable you own. Imagine you have no cash today, but you own a field that will grow a good harvest next year. You go to a lender and say: “Build my house now, and I will pay you back from next year’s harvest.” That is the deal. Here, the “house” is our roads and railways, and the “harvest” is our future lithium money. We get the railway now; China gets repaid later from the minerals we sell. The promise is the bridge between the two.

Minister Ncube was clear that the homework is ours to do first: “It is now up to us to determine which roads we want to develop, how much these roads will cost, how much revenue can be generated through tolling systems, and how much financing would need to be supplemented through natural resource-backed investments.” In other words — work out which projects, at what cost, how much the tolls can repay, and only then how much to borrow against the minerals. That sequence matters enormously, and we will return to why.

The Before

How We Let the Railway Die

To feel why this news stirs such hope, you must remember how far we have fallen. The National Railways of Zimbabwe, born in 1893 and headquartered in Bulawayo, was once one of the finest railways in Africa. In its prime it moved more than 14 million tonnes of cargo a year and carried us, in our hundreds of thousands, across the country in comfort. Then came deregulation, decades of mismanagement, and a collapsing economy. The numbers tell a brutal story.

The Fall · NRZ Freight Carried Per Year
From over 14 million tonnes to under 3
The railway can carry 18 million tonnes a year. At its peak it moved 14.4 million. Today it struggles past 3 million — so the coal and minerals that should ride the rails now pound our highways to dust instead.
The Railway We Had
  • Among Africa’s best rail systems in the 1970s–90s
  • Over 14 million tonnes of freight a year
  • Night passenger trains linking every major city
  • An electrified mainline (Gweru to Harare) from 1983
The Railway We Have
  • Only about 60 of 168 locomotives still working
  • The electric line stripped — copper cables stolen
  • Passenger trains suspended since 2020; coaches rotting
  • Abandoned carriages now shelters, not transport

That last line should shame us all. Reporters have walked through our once-proud passenger coaches and found them rusting in the long grass at Harare and Bulawayo stations — turned into hiding places and sleeping spots for the desperate. The train that carried a nation now carries only our neglect. This is the hole the Minister is trying to fill — and the African Development Bank puts the size of that hole at a staggering US$34 billion to modernise all our roads, rail and logistics. No ordinary budget can find that. Hence the reach for our minerals.

The Mountain to Climb · The Money Needed vs the Money We Have
Why the government is reaching for lithium
The full modernisation bill (AfDB estimate) dwarfs the current rail-revival programme under NDS2 and this year’s budget allocation. The gap between what we need and what we have is exactly the space a resource-backed loan is meant to fill.
Our Bargaining Chip

Why Lithium, and Why China

Here is the happy part of the story, and it is real. Zimbabwe is now Africa’s largest producer of lithium — the “white gold” that powers the batteries in electric cars, phones and solar storage the whole world is rushing to buy. In 2025 we sent about 1.13 million tonnes of lithium concentrate to China alone — roughly 15% of all the lithium China imported. Since 2021, Chinese companies have poured more than US$2 billion into our lithium mines (firms such as Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, Sinomine and Yahua, at mines like Arcadia, Bikita and Kamativi). For once, the world needs something we have in abundance.

And here is the clever logic. China needs our lithium for its enormous battery industry; China also builds railways better and cheaper than almost anyone on earth; and China needs our railway to work so its minerals can reach the sea. Our need and theirs point in the same direction. That is genuine leverage — if we use it wisely.

The Beneficiation Thread — Keep the Value Home
This is why the Minister also confirmed that Zimbabwe will not delay its ban on exporting raw lithium concentrate from January 2027, despite the mining companies begging for more time. The logic is the same one this journal has argued for years, whether about gold, data, crops or power: do not export the raw rock — refine it here, and keep the real value at home. Huayou has already built a lithium-processing plant; Sinomine is building another at Bikita. Selling refined lithium chemicals instead of raw stone could multiply what every tonne earns us. That instinct is exactly right.

The Catch

Now the Hard Question — Ask It With Me

Here is where love must make room for caution, and where I need every Zimbabwean reading this to lean in. Borrowing against your minerals can build a nation — or it can quietly rob it. The difference lies entirely in the details of the deal. And we do not have to imagine how it can go wrong, because our neighbour has already shown us.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, a famous “minerals-for-infrastructure” deal with Chinese companies — called Sicomines, worth some US$7 billion — promised roads and railways in exchange for copper and cobalt. So what did the DRC actually receive? According to the DRC’s own government finance inspectors, after all these years barely US$822 million of infrastructure had been built — while the Chinese investors took home nearly US$10 billion in profit. Look at that gap, and never forget it.

The Warning Next Door · The DRC’s Sicomines Deal
What the DRC got vs what the investors got
The DRC’s own Inspectorate General of Finances: about US$822 million in infrastructure delivered, against nearly US$10 billion in profit for the Chinese partners. A minerals-for-infrastructure deal is only as good as its terms — and bad terms can hand away a fortune for a fraction of its worth.

This is not a reason to refuse China. It is a reason to negotiate like our grandchildren are watching — because they are. A lithium-for-railways deal could be a triumph or a trap, and the line between them is drawn in the fine print. So before we sign anything, here are the questions every citizen should demand answers to.

What is our lithium really worth?
If we pledge future mineral money, it must be valued honestly and at full market price — not undercounted today so that we hand over far more rock than the railway is worth.
Will we see the contract?
Resource-backed loans go wrong in the dark. The terms, the interest, the valuations and the repayment schedule must be public and tabled before Parliament — not hidden as “commercially confidential.”
Who builds — and who works?
Will Zimbabwean firms and Zimbabwean hands build these railways, with skills and jobs staying here? Or will everything, down to the labour, be imported and the money simply pass through?
Can the tolls and freight actually repay it?
The Minister’s own sequence is right: prove how much real revenue the roads and rail will earn first, and borrow against minerals only for the genuine gap — not for the whole bill.
What happens if lithium prices crash?
Mineral prices swing wildly. If we pledge tonnes rather than dollars and the price falls, we could owe far more of our wealth than we ever meant to. The deal must protect us from that.
Tete Getty’s Take

Bring Back the Train — but Don’t Pawn the Mountain

Let me hold both feelings at once, because both are true. The first is joy. The idea of a Zimbabwean child once again falling asleep to the song of the rails, waking to a new city at dawn, riding a railway rebuilt and modern and ours — that is a future worth fighting for. A working railway is not nostalgia; it is cheaper goods, saved highways, revived towns, jobs in Bulawayo’s old railway yards, and minerals reaching the sea without destroying our roads. I want the train back with my whole heart.

The second feeling is vigilance. We have been here before, as a continent — handing over the certain wealth of the ground for the uncertain promise of development, and watching the wealth leave while the promise thinned to nothing. The DRC’s experience is not a rumour; it is a warning written by the DRC’s own auditors. So let our answer be neither the frightened “no” that leaves the coaches rotting, nor the reckless “yes” that signs away the mountain in the dark. Let it be the careful “yes, on these terms”: honest valuation, an open contract before Parliament, Zimbabwean hands on the work, tolls proven before minerals pledged, and protection if prices fall.

This is the same lesson stitched through every entry of this journal, from data to crops to power and now to steel rails: the wealth of Zimbabwe belongs to Zimbabweans, and our task in this generation is simply to stop giving it away for less than it is worth. The January 2027 ban on raw exports shows we are learning to keep the value home. Let the railway deal be cut from the same cloth. Build us the line — but let it be a line that serves us, paid for by minerals we sold at a fair price, with our names on the contract and our children on the train. Make the whistle sound in the dark again — but this time, let it be ours. Pamberi nezvitima zvedu — forward with our own trains.

A Note for Balance
This is analysis and education, not investment advice, and not a verdict on China — which has built real, valuable infrastructure across Africa. The argument here is for good terms, transparency and fair value, not for refusing partnership. A well-structured resource-backed deal can genuinely transform a country; a badly-structured one can quietly impoverish it. Everything depends on the fine print Zimbabwe has not yet written.
A railway is a promise a country makes to its own future: that goods will move, that towns will live, that a child in Bulawayo can reach Harare by morning. We let that promise rust. If our lithium can renew it, let us seize the chance — but sign with our eyes open, our contract in the light, and our grandchildren’s inheritance protected. The train can come home. Let us make sure we still own the tracks.
Tete Getty · TGRI · The Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 37 · 27 June 2026
TeteGetty.com
The Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 37 · Minerals & Infrastructure · 27 June 2026
Sources & further reading: The announcement: Reuters, Mining.com, Mining Weekly, Mining Digital, Investment Monitor, The Zimbabwe Mail and NewZimbabwe (24–25 June 2026) — Finance, Economic Development and Investment Promotion Minister Prof Mthuli Ncube’s statement at the World Economic Forum (Annual Meeting of the New Champions) in Dalian on resource-linked debt instruments with China Railway for roads and rail, his quoted remarks, and the confirmation that the January 2027 lithium-concentrate export ban will proceed; Zimbabwe as Africa’s largest lithium producer, exporting about 1.13 million tonnes of spodumene concentrate to China in 2025 (around 15% of China’s imports); Chinese investment of more than US$2 billion since 2021 (Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, Sinomine Resource Group, Yahua/Sichuan Yahua, Chengxin) across mines including Arcadia/Prospect, Bikita and Kamativi; the African Development Bank’s ~US$34 billion infrastructure estimate; the December 2022 raw-ore ban and Mines Minister Winston Chitando’s June 2025 concentrate-ban announcement; the May 2024 China Railway Group MoU (~US$533 million) on the National Railways of Zimbabwe. The Sicomines comparison: Mining Digital, citing the DRC’s Inspectorate General of Finances — approximately US$822 million of infrastructure delivered against nearly US$10 billion in profit for Chinese investors under the ~US$7 billion deal. The railway’s history and decline: National Railways of Zimbabwe (nrz.co.zw), Wikipedia and Pindula (founded 1893; peak ~14.4 million tonnes vs ~12.4 million in 1998 and 18 million installed capacity; 60 of 168 locomotives and 3,512 of 7,153 wagons in service; vandalised Gweru–Harare electrification; passenger services suspended since 2020); The Herald (the ~US$2 billion NDS2 rail-revival programme and US$600 million 2026 budget allocation; 30 locomotives, wagons and train-control plans; GM Respina Zinyanduko, spokesperson Andrew Kunambura); The Globe and Mail and The Africa Report on the human cost of the passenger-rail collapse. Regional context: Mining Digital on Mozambique’s 15% state-ownership rule and DRC cobalt quotas as part of a wider African move to retain mineral value. The personal recollection, the analysis, the five questions and the conclusions are TGRI’s own editorial work. Figures are as reported; this is analysis and education, not investment advice.
Produced by the Tete Getty Research Institute (TGRI) for TeteGetty.com, as Entry 37 of the Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal. Written so that the grandmother who once rode the night train and the official negotiating in Dalian share one clear picture — in the Pan-African conviction that the wealth of Zimbabwe belongs to Zimbabweans, and must never again be given away for less than it is worth. Neither East nor West. Republication with attribution welcome. © TeteGetty.com 2026

Leave a Reply

Trending