The Emerald Turned to Stone: Sandawana’s 39.9-Million-Tonne Lithium Resource, the Certificate, and the Plant That Isn’t Built Yet | Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 52 | TeteGetty.com
TeteGetty.com
Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 52
25 July 2026
Economic Journal · Mining, Value Addition & the Battery Economy
Sandawana · Mberengwa · Block A · The JORC Certificate

The Emerald Turned to Stone: Sandawana’s 39.9-Million-Tonne Lithium Resource, the Certificate, and the Plant That Isn’t Built Yet

The mine that gave the world its finest emeralds has certified something new. An independent, JORC-compliant assessment has confirmed 39.9 million tonnes of lithium resource at Sandawana’s Block A — with an unusually high 72% classified as measured, the highest grade of certainty. It is genuinely bankable, wholly Zimbabwean-owned, and real cause for pride. But the certificate covers only 30% of the claim, the processing plant is still at feasibility stage, and the export ban that was meant to force value addition arrives in five months. This entry separates the achievement from the announcement.

39.9 Million Tonnes · Block A 72% Measured Only 30% of the Claim Zimbabwean-Owned Charts & Data Inside
39.9Mt
JORC-Certified Resource, Block A
72%
Classified as Measured — Highest Certainty
30%
Of the Claim This Covers — 70% Unexplored
1.39%
Average Grade, Li₂O
For fifty years this ground gave up emeralds so green they set the world standard. Now it offers a grey rock that runs the world’s batteries. The stone changed; the question did not. Will Zimbabwe finish it here — or ship it raw, as we did the emeralds, and buy back the value someone else added?
Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 52 · 25 July 2026
What Was Announced

A Real Milestone, Stated Precisely

On Wednesday 22 July 2026, at a briefing in Harare, Mutapa Energy Resources — the state mining company, successor to Kuvimba Mining House — announced that an independent assessment conducted under the internationally recognised JORC Code had certified a 39.9-million-tonne lithium resource at the Sandawana project in Mberengwa. Chief executive Innocent Rukweza said the resource had been confirmed by a competent person, which is precisely what makes it bankable — the technical threshold international lenders and investors require before they will fund a mine.

39.9Mt
Total resource
Block A
1.39%
Average grade
Li₂O
103,000m
Drilling over
11 months
US$24m
Spent on the
exploration programme
Source: Mutapa Energy Resources JORC-compliant results, announced Harare, 22 July 2026, as reported by NewsDay, ZimLive, Mining Zimbabwe, NewZimbabwe and SMM/Metal.com. The programme involved 103,000 metres of drilling and 33,000 samples over 11 months at a cost of US$24 million.

The figure that genuinely distinguishes Sandawana is not the tonnage — it is the quality of certainty. Of the 39.9 million tonnes, about 28.7 million (roughly 72%) is classified as “measured”, the highest confidence category in the JORC hierarchy. Rukweza claimed this makes Sandawana the first Zimbabwean mine with measured resources at 72% of the total.

Why “72% Measured” Is the Real Headline
JORC classifies a resource by geological confidence. The more that is “measured”, the lower the risk — and the easier to finance.
~72% Measured — about 28.7Mt. Highest confidence; drilled and sampled densely enough to be relied upon.
~7% Indicated — about 2.7Mt. Good confidence, wider spacing.
~21% Inferred — about 8.5Mt. Lowest confidence; estimated from limited data.
Figures per the SMM/Metal.com report of the JORC estimate: Block A total 39.9Mt at 1.39% Li₂O, with measured ~28.6–28.7Mt (72%), indicated ~2.7Mt (6.8%), inferred ~8.5Mt (21%). Percentages are rounded and do not sum to exactly 100. A high measured share reduces geological risk and improves access to debt and equity finance.
In Plain Language — What Does “JORC-Certified” Actually Mean?

JORC is a rulebook. It stands for the Joint Ore Reserves Committee, an Australian-born standard used worldwide to stop mining companies from exaggerating what is in the ground. Under JORC, a qualified independent expert — a “competent person” — must sign off on the numbers, staking their professional reputation on them.

Why it matters: a bank will not lend hundreds of millions against a rumour. Before Sandawana had this certificate, its lithium was a promising story. After it, the resource is a documented asset a lender can underwrite. That is the difference between “we think there is lithium here” and “an accredited expert confirms 39.9 million tonnes, and 72% of it to the highest standard.”

But — and hold this thought — bankable is not the same as banked. A resource being fit to finance does not mean the finance has arrived, the plant is built, or a single battery-grade tonne has been produced. It means you are now allowed to knock on the door.

The Ground Itself

The Mine That Gave the World Its Emeralds

Zimbabweans should know what this place is, because it carries a lesson older than lithium.

Sandawana, in Mberengwa, was for decades one of the most famous emerald mines on earth. From the 1950s its stones — small, but of extraordinary depth of colour — were prized by the world’s finest jewellers and set a global benchmark for quality. The name Sandawana meant something in Geneva and New York long before anyone spoke of battery minerals. This is not a new mine. It is old ground, giving up a new stone.

And there is a hard historical truth folded into that pride. For most of that emerald century, the gems left Zimbabwe rough. The cutting, the polishing, the setting, the branding, the enormous markup — all of it happened elsewhere. A stone worth a little at the mine mouth in Mberengwa became worth a fortune in a shop window in Europe, and almost none of that difference stayed here. We dug the beauty; others sold it.

The Reason This History Belongs in an Economics Journal
Sandawana is the same lesson twice. The emeralds taught it and we did not learn it: a country that exports a raw treasure exports its own prosperity with it. Now the very same ground offers a second chance with a second mineral — and this time there is a law designed to force the lesson home. The question is whether Sandawana becomes the place where Zimbabwe finally finished what it dug, or a second verse of the same old song.

Under Kuvimba, and now Mutapa Energy Resources, the mine strategically shifted from emeralds to lithium after exploration revealed the scale of the deposit. And here is the fact that gives this story its weight: Sandawana is described as the only major lithium mine in the country wholly owned by Zimbabweans, through the state. Most of Zimbabwe’s producing lithium — Bikita, Arcadia, Kamativi and others — sits under substantial Chinese ownership. Sandawana is the national exception, and that is exactly why what happens to it matters beyond its tonnage.

The Honest Proportions

Thirty Per Cent of One Claim — and Why That Cuts Both Ways

Now the number the celebratory headlines rushed past, and which this journal insists on placing at the centre.

The certified 39.9 million tonnes comes from Block A alone — about 30% of Sandawana’s 3,800-hectare claim. The remaining 70%, Blocks B and C, has not yet been drilled to JORC standard; geochemical and geophysical work is under way. Management’s stated ambition is to upgrade the total resource toward 90 million tonnes, and older reporting has floated figures around 100 million.

What Is Certified, and What Is Still Aspiration
The claim divided by exploration status — the certified reality against the stated ambition.
39.9Mt
Block A
CERTIFIED · 30% of claim
?
Blocks B & C
UNEXPLORED · 70% of claim
~90Mt
Stated target
ASPIRATION · not certified
Block A’s 39.9Mt is JORC-certified. Blocks B and C are unexplored; their bar is illustrative only, not an estimate. The ~90Mt target is management’s stated ambition and is expressly not a certified figure. Do not read the three bars as comparable measured quantities. Source: Mutapa Energy Resources, 22 July 2026.

This cuts two ways, and honesty requires both. The optimistic reading: if 30% of the claim holds nearly 40 million tonnes at this quality, the full concession could be one of the more significant lithium assets anywhere — enormous upside. The disciplined reading: 90 million tonnes is not a resource, it is a hope, and this journal has watched too many African mineral announcements quote the dream figure as though it were money in the bank.

The right posture is to celebrate exactly what was certified — 39.9 million tonnes, 72% measured, at Block A — and to treat everything beyond it as promising exploration that must itself be drilled, sampled and signed off by a competent person before anyone banks it. Bankable means Block A. The rest is still a question mark, however hopeful.

The Part Nobody Put on the Poster

A Certificate Is Not a Plant

Here is the tension at the heart of this announcement, and it is a serious one.

Zimbabwe has banned the export of lithium concentrates from 1 January 2027. The policy — which this journal supports in principle — is meant to force value addition: no more shipping out semi-processed rock, process it into battery-grade material here, capture the value at home. The ban follows the 2022 ban on raw ore and a February 2026 emergency clampdown after stockpiles were found at the port of Beira.

And here is the difficulty. As of mid-2026, Sandawana’s processing plan was still at feasibility study stage — behind peers. Huayou Cobalt has already built its plant and is exporting lithium sulphate; Sinomine’s Bikita and Yahua’s Kamativi are under construction. The state’s own flagship — the one wholly-owned Zimbabwean asset — is the furthest from complying with the government’s own deadline.

Innocent Rukweza · CEO, Mutapa Energy Resources · Chair, Lithium producers’ association · Victoria Falls, June 2026
“we remain, as an industry, committed to the story of lithium”
Requesting that the beneficiation deadline shift from January 2027 to June 2027, framing it as an operational runway rather than resistance — the industry citing US$1.45 billion committed to beneficiation.

So the lithium producers, chaired by Sandawana’s own chief executive, have formally asked government to move the deadline to June 2027 — not to abandon beneficiation, but because plants under construction physically cannot be finished in time. It is a reasonable request, and it exposes an awkward truth: the government has set a hard deadline that its own mine cannot yet meet. Enforcing a ban the state itself would fail is a credibility problem; softening it for everyone risks the whole value-addition policy that Zimbabwe’s future depends on.

The Real Build: What Sandawana Still Has to Do
Reported development plan and investment for Block A — the distance between a certificate and a battery-grade tonne.
Concentrator plant & infrastructure (planned)~US$300m
Sulphate plant for battery-grade lithium (planned)~US$400m
Total Block A development (planned)~US$700m
Source: Mining Zimbabwe reporting of the reported development plan — concentrator (~US$300m) plus sulphate plant (~US$400m), roughly US$700m for Block A. A concentrator capacity of about 600,000 tonnes per annum has been reported, with a larger 3-million-tonne figure cited elsewhere; commissioning targeted around early 2027. Figures are the company’s stated plans, not committed or disbursed finance.
The China Question, Stated Fairly
Sandawana’s concentrator is planned under a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) arrangement with Chinese partners linked to Huayou Cobalt and Tsingshan, reported at around US$300 million. Under BOT, the partners do not take equity — they finance and build the plant, operate it for a minimum period (reported as at least five years) to recover costs and earn a return, then transfer the asset to the Zimbabwean state. Handled well, this is exactly how a capital-poor nation acquires an asset it could not build alone — the emerald mistake reversed. Handled badly, “transfer” dates slip and the operating years stretch. The model is sound; the execution and the contract terms are everything. This journal will watch the transfer clock.
The Value Ladder

Where Sandawana Sits Today — and Where the Money Is

Lithium, like our granite in Entry 49 and our emeralds before it, is worth a little at the bottom of the ladder and a fortune at the top. The certificate confirms the resource. It does not move Sandawana up a single rung. That takes the plant.

The Lithium Value Ladder
Each rung multiplies the value. Zimbabwe’s policy aim is to stop exporting at the bottom.
1
Raw ore (spodumene rock)
Banned since 2022
2
Lithium concentrate — crushed, semi-processed
Banned from Jan 2027
3
Lithium sulphate — battery-precursor chemical
The target rung
4
Battery-grade lithium (carbonate / hydroxide)
The prize
5
Cathodes, cells, batteries
The frontier
Illustrative value ladder based on Zimbabwe’s stated beneficiation policy. The concentrate export ban is designed to push producers from rungs 1–2 up to rung 3 (sulphate) and beyond. Sandawana currently produces at the bottom; the sulphate plant is the rung it is reaching for. Not to numerical scale.
In Plain Language — Why Should an Ordinary Zimbabwean Care?

Because this is the difference between a job and a fortune. If Sandawana ships crushed rock, it earns a mine-mouth price, employs a modest crew, and the real money — the chemistry that turns rock into battery material — is made in China and captured there.

If Sandawana builds the sulphate plant, Zimbabwe climbs the ladder — more skilled jobs, chemists and engineers and technicians, a higher price per tonne, and an asset that, under the BOT deal, eventually belongs to the nation. Same rock. Utterly different future. The entire question is whether the plant gets built before the resource gets shipped.

The Honest Ledger

What This Certificate Delivers, and What It Does Not

The Balance Sheet of the Announcement

What the JORC certificate genuinely delivers

Bankability — an independently verified resource lenders can underwrite.

Exceptional certainty — 72% measured is a strong, investor-friendly number.

National pride and ownership — a world-class asset wholly Zimbabwean-owned.

Leverage to court finance for the US$700m Block A build.

Proof of scale — and huge upside across the unexplored 70%.

What it does not do

It does not build the plant. Processing is still at feasibility stage.

It does not certify 90 million tonnes. That is ambition, not resource.

It does not meet the 2027 deadline. The state’s own mine is behind.

It does not produce one battery-grade tonne. No value added yet.

It is not finance in hand. Bankable is permission to ask, not money received.

What Would Make This Real

Five Things to Watch, and One to Build

Break ground on the sulphate plant
A concentrator alone leaves Zimbabwe on the middle rung. Battery-grade sulphate is where the value and the jobs are.
Publish the BOT transfer terms
How many operating years, on what conditions, with what transfer date? The nation should see the clock it is running against.
Hold — or honestly revise — the 2027 line
Either enforce the deadline evenly, or move it transparently for all. A quiet exemption for the state mine would corrode the whole policy.
Drill Blocks B and C to JORC standard
Turn the 90-million-tonne hope into a certified figure — or adjust the ambition to what the ground actually holds.
Report the finance as it lands
Bankable is a starting gun. Who lends, how much, at what terms, in what currency — published, not announced.
Train Zimbabweans to run the chemistry
The BOT transfer is worthless if, when the plant is handed over, no Zimbabwean can operate it. Skills are the real asset transferred.
Tete Getty’s Take

Do Not Ship the Emerald Twice

Let me say the good part without hedging, because it is real. This is a genuine achievement, and a Zimbabwean one. A wholly national asset, certified to an international standard, with a measured-resource share that would make any mining financier sit up. The team that drilled 103,000 metres and spent US$24 million to produce a number a bank will respect deserves the country’s congratulations. Makorokoto. And it is fitting that the ground doing this is Sandawana — old, proud ground that has given Zimbabwe treasure before.

But that history is exactly why I cannot let the celebration stop at the certificate. Sandawana has already taught this country one lesson, and we paid for it in emeralds. For half a century the most beautiful green stones on earth left this soil rough, and the fortune was made in other people’s shops. We got the hole in the ground; they got the jewellery. If we now certify 40 million tonnes of lithium, ship it as concentrate because the plant wasn’t ready, and buy back the battery — we will have shipped the emerald twice. Same mine. Same mistake. A different mineral to be ashamed of.

The whole game is the plant. Not the certificate — the plant. The certificate is a fine thing; it is a ticket to the room where the money is. But Zimbabwe has a long and painful history of announcing tickets and never quite entering the room. The 2027 ban was supposed to be the forcing function — the discipline that says: build the plant, or lose the right to export. And now the state’s own flagship is asking for more time. I understand why. But understand what is at stake: if the rule bends first for the government’s own mine, every private miner will demand the same, and the value-addition policy that is Zimbabwe’s single best economic idea in a generation will quietly die of exceptions.

So my counsel is the same as it was for granite in UMP, for the tourism fund, for every door this journal has watched open. The asset was never the problem. Zimbabwe’s ground is generous — emeralds yesterday, lithium today, and more tomorrow. The problem has always been that we stop one rung too low and let someone else climb the rest. Build the sulphate plant. Publish the transfer clock. Train the chemists. Hold the line on 2027 or move it honestly for everyone. Do that, and Sandawana becomes the place where Zimbabwe finally kept the value it dug.

Nyika inovakwa nevene vayo — uye zvinobva muvhu redu zvinopedziswa muno. A country is built by its owners — and what comes from our soil must be finished here. Ziva kwakabva ibwe iri: rakatanga riri emurara, zvino ratova ibwe rebatani. Know where this stone came from: it began as an emerald, now it is the battery’s stone. Let us not sell it raw a second time. Pamberi nekupedzisa, kwete kutumira zvisina kupera. Forward with finishing — not with shipping the unfinished. Tigashire.

For fifty years Sandawana sent its emeralds abroad rough, and the world grew rich cutting stones we dug in Mberengwa. Now the same ground offers us lithium, and a law that says: finish it here or do not sell it. The certificate proves the treasure is real. Only the plant will prove we finally learned. Do not ship the emerald twice.
Tete Getty · TGRI · Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 52 · 25 July 2026
Continuity in This Journal
Entry 52 follows Entry 51 on Zimbabwe joining the BRICS New Development Bank, Entry 50 on the tourism surge, and Entry 49 on granite value addition in Uzumba-Maramba-Pfungwe. The same argument runs through all of them: Zimbabwe’s wealth is real and in the ground, and the only question that has ever mattered is whether we finish it at home or export it raw and buy it back. Sandawana is that question in its oldest and clearest form — the mine that already got it wrong once, holding the tools to get it right.
TeteGetty.com
Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal · Entry 52 · 25 July 2026
Sources & notes: The announcement: Mutapa Energy Resources (MER), the state mining company and successor to Kuvimba Mining House, announced a JORC Code-compliant resource of 39.9 million tonnes of lithium at the Sandawana project’s Block A at a briefing in Harare on Wednesday 22 July 2026; CEO Innocent Rukweza stated the resource was confirmed by a competent person, making it bankable, with about 28.7 million tonnes (roughly 72%) classified as measured — described as the highest measured-resource share of any Zimbabwean mine — from an 11-month programme involving 103,000 metres of drilling, 33,000 samples and US$24 million of investment (NewsDay Zimbabwe, 22 July 2026; ZimLive; The Zimbabwean; Mining Zimbabwe; NewZimbabwe.com). Grade and classification: SMM/Metal.com reported Block A at 39.9Mt averaging 1.39% Li₂O, with measured ~28.6Mt (72%), indicated ~2.7Mt (6.8%) and inferred ~8.5Mt (21%); percentages are rounded. Proportion of claim: the certified resource covers Block A only, about 30% of the 3,800-hectare (reported elsewhere as 3,882-hectare) concession; Blocks B and C, the remaining ~70%, are unexplored to JORC standard with geochemical and geophysical work under way; management’s stated ambition is to upgrade the total toward 90 million tonnes, with earlier reporting citing figures around 100 million tonnes (ZimLive; Mining Zimbabwe; The Zimbabwe Independent, 2024; Kuvimba Mining House). Heritage: Sandawana in Mberengwa was, from the 1950s, one of the world’s most celebrated emerald mines, renowned for small stones of exceptional colour, before shifting focus from emeralds to lithium under Kuvimba/MER ownership; it is reported as the only major lithium mine in Zimbabwe wholly owned by Zimbabweans through the state (Mining Zimbabwe, November 2025; Modern Treatise, June 2026). Processing and the export ban: Zimbabwe banned raw lithium ore exports in 2022 and, per a June 2025 Cabinet decision announced by Mines Minister Winston Chitando, will ban lithium concentrate exports from 1 January 2027 to force local beneficiation; a February 2026 emergency ban followed the discovery of stockpiles at the port of Beira, and a quota/tax system (including a reported 10–16% export tax) currently governs concentrate exports. As of mid-2026 Sandawana’s processing plan was at feasibility stage, behind Huayou Cobalt (plant complete, exporting lithium sulphate), Sinomine’s Bikita and Yahua’s Kamativi (under construction); the Zimbabwe lithium producers’ association, chaired by Rukweza, requested at a June 2026 Victoria Falls conference that the deadline move to June 2027, citing US$1.45 billion committed to beneficiation, without government confirmation of a response at the time (Discovery Alert, June 2026; Mining Zimbabwe, June 2026; BU Global Development Policy Center; McCarthy Tétrault; allAfrica). Development plan and BOT: reported Block A development of about US$700 million — concentrator and infrastructure ~US$300m, sulphate plant ~US$400m; a concentrator of about 600,000 tonnes per annum (a 3-million-tonne figure is cited elsewhere) targeted for commissioning around early 2027; the concentrator planned under a Build-Operate-Transfer arrangement with Chinese partners linked to Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt and Tsingshan Holding Group (cooperation agreement September 2024, BOT confirmed February 2026), under which partners finance, build and operate the plant for a minimum reported five years before transferring assets and title to the Zimbabwean state (Mining Zimbabwe; SMM/Metal.com; Modern Treatise). Editorial note: the interpretation of “bankable” versus “banked”, the emerald-to-lithium value-addition argument, the assessment of the 2027 deadline tension, the value ladder, and all recommendations are the analysis and opinion of the author. Where sources differ on figures (hectares, concentrator capacity, percentage rounding, total-resource ambition) this entry notes the range. This is economic analysis and public-interest journalism, not investment advice.
Produced by the Tete Getty Research Institute (TGRI) for TeteGetty.com, as Entry 52 of the Second Great Zimbabwe Economic Journal, in continuity with this journal’s reporting on granite value addition, the tourism financing mechanism and the BRICS New Development Bank. Written in memory of half a century of Sandawana emeralds that left this soil rough, and in the conviction that a country which exports a raw treasure exports its own prosperity with it. The stone changed from green to grey; the duty did not. Nyika inovakwa nevene vayo, uye zvinobva muvhu redu zvinopedziswa muno. Neither East nor West — Africa first, and Africa finishing what it digs. Republication with attribution welcome. © TeteGetty.com 2026

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from TETEGETTY.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading